Apple M2 Max vs Athlon 64 FX-76

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-76 and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiencyno data20.14
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)no data
Release dateNovember 2006 (18 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-76 and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache1 MB36 MB
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Die size235 mm2no data
Number of transistors227 million67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-76 and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFno data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt79 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 79 Watt

Apple M2 Max has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 58.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-76 and Apple M2 Max. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-76 is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-76 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-76
Athlon 64 FX-76
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-76 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 235 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-76 or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.