Athlon 900 vs Athlon 64 LE-1600

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 LE-1600 and Athlon 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Thunderbird (1999−2000)
Release dateOctober 2007 (17 years ago)6 March 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 LE-1600 and Athlon 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm180 nm
Die size230 mm2102 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °C70 °C
Number of transistors227 million22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 LE-1600 and Athlon 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2A
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt60 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 LE-1600 and Athlon 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 60 Watt

Athlon 64 LE-1600 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 LE-1600 and Athlon 900. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 LE-1600 and Athlon 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600
Athlon 64 LE-1600
AMD Athlon 900
Athlon 900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 LE-1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 LE-1600 or Athlon 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.