Phenom II X6 1035T vs A8-6500

Aggregate performance score

A8-6500
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.81
Phenom II X6 1035T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
1.92
+6.1%

Phenom II X6 1035T outperforms A8-6500 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20131966
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.17
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.591.88
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Thuban (2010)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)27 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2346 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8570Dno data
Number of pipelines256no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6500 1.81
Phenom II X6 1035T 1.92
+6.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-6500 2820
Phenom II X6 1035T 3000
+6.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.81 1.92
Recency 1 June 2013 27 April 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

A8-6500 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X6 1035T, on the other hand, has a 6.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6500 and Phenom II X6 1035T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6500
A8-6500
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Phenom II X6 1035T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 104 votes

Rate A8-6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 108 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1035T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6500 or Phenom II X6 1035T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.