i5-3470T vs Phenom II X6 1035T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1035T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
1.89
Core i5-3470T
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.89

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19681967
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.220.20
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.885.11
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date27 April 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189$210

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom II X6 1035T has 10% better value for money than i5-3470T.

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads64
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size346 mm293.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors904 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 2500
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1035T 1.89
i5-3470T 1.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1035T 3001
i5-3470T 3001

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 April 2010 1 June 2012
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Phenom II X6 1035T has 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

i5-3470T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1035T and Core i5-3470T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Phenom II X6 1035T
Intel Core i5-3470T
Core i5-3470T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 109 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1035T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 68 votes

Rate Core i5-3470T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1035T or Core i5-3470T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.