Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs A8-6500

Aggregate performance score

A8-6500
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.78
+36.9%
Core 2 Quad Q8400
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.30

A8-6500 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8400 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20272281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.591.30
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)19 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz0.67 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm22x 82 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million456 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA775,LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8570DOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
จำนวนพาธไลน์256no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6500 1.78
+36.9%
Core 2 Quad Q8400 1.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-6500 2824
+36.6%
Core 2 Quad Q8400 2068

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-6500 442
+34.8%
Core 2 Quad Q8400 328

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-6500 1042
+16.2%
Core 2 Quad Q8400 897

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.78 1.30
Recency 1 June 2013 19 April 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

A8-6500 has a 36.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The A8-6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q8400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6500 and Core 2 Quad Q8400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6500
A8-6500
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core 2 Quad Q8400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 108 votes

Rate A8-6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1346 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6500 or Core 2 Quad Q8400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.