Celeron 6205 vs A6-9220e

VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220e and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2777not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency9.74no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Tiger Lake U (2020)
Release date1 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9220e and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2/2 GHz
L1 cache160 KB160 KB
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220e and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGABGA1499
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220e and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220e and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220e and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.17 4.55
Recency 1 June 2017 1 September 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

A6-9220e has 150% lower power consumption.

Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has 288.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A6-9220e and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220e and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e
Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 315 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220e or Celeron 6205, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.