Core 2 Extreme X7800 vs A6-5400K
Aggregate performance score
A6-5400K outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7800 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A6-5400K and Core 2 Extreme X7800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2600 | 2691 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Extreme |
| Power efficiency | 1.16 | 1.55 |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Merom XE (2007) |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 17 July 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $851 |
Detailed specifications
A6-5400K and Core 2 Extreme X7800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.1V-1.375V |
Compatibility
Information on A6-5400K and Core 2 Extreme X7800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM2 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 44 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5400K and Core 2 Extreme X7800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
A6-5400K and Core 2 Extreme X7800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5400K and Core 2 Extreme X7800 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5400K and Core 2 Extreme X7800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 7540D | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.80 | 0.72 |
| Recency | 2 October 2012 | 17 July 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 44 Watt |
A6-5400K has a 11.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Extreme X7800, on the other hand, has 47.7% lower power consumption.
The A6-5400K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X7800 in performance tests.
Note that A6-5400K is a desktop processor while Core 2 Extreme X7800 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5400K and Core 2 Extreme X7800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
