Celeron M 925 vs A12-9800E

VS

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800E and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1832not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.91no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency5.91no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$105$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9800E and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800E and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800E and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800E and Celeron M 925 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800E and Celeron M 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800E and Celeron M 925 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800E and Celeron M 925 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800E and Celeron M 925.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2017 1 January 2011
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

A12-9800E has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A12-9800E and Celeron M 925. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A12-9800E is a desktop processor while Celeron M 925 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800E and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800E
A12-9800E
Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 49 votes

Rate A12-9800E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800E or Celeron M 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.