Phenom X4 9850 (95W) vs A10-5800K
Primary details
Comparing A10-5800K and Phenom X4 9850 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1995 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.35 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.77 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (12 years ago) | October 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $122 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
A10-5800K and Phenom X4 9850 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 285 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 450 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-5800K and Phenom X4 9850 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2 | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 95 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5800K and Phenom X4 9850 (95W) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5800K and Phenom X4 9850 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7660D (800 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 95 Watt |
A10-5800K has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Phenom X4 9850 (95W), on the other hand, has 5.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-5800K and Phenom X4 9850 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5800K and Phenom X4 9850 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
