Quadro P620 vs Wii U GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.27
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameLatteGP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 November 2012 (12 years ago)1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160512
Core clock speed550 MHz1177 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1443 MHz
Number of transistors880 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate8.80046.18
Floating-point processing power0.176 TFLOPS1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 November 2012 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 40 Watt

Wii U GPU has 21.2% lower power consumption.

Quadro P620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Wii U GPU and Quadro P620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Wii U GPU is a notebook card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Wii U GPU
Wii U GPU
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Wii U GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 617 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.