Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs ATI Video Xpression

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMach64Raven
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 1995 (29 years ago)23 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed62 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors1 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data35.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.126 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed62 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth496.0 MB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 1995 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 600 nm 14 nm

Vega 8 Efficient has an age advantage of 22 years, and a 4185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Video Xpression and Radeon Vega 8 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Video Xpression
Video Xpression
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 53 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 8 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.