Radeon RX 5300M vs ATI Graphics Pro Turbo

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.09
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameMach64Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1995 (29 years ago)13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1408
Core clock speed40 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1445 MHz
Number of transistors1 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data127.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.069 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUsno data88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 MB3 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed40 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 MB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 600 nm 7 nm

RX 5300M has a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 8471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Pro Turbo and Radeon RX 5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Pro Turbo is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5300M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Pro Turbo
Graphics Pro Turbo
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 17 votes

Rate Graphics Pro Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 96 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.