UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	572	719
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.69	no data
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	no data
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	32
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1250 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	28.80	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	3	no data
TMUs	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

24−27
+71.4%

−71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3
+100%

1−2

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −225%	13 +225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +50%	6 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−250%

7−8
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics P630 is 71% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 50% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 350% faster.

All in all, in popular games: