UHD Graphics P630 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and UHD Graphics P630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023
2.32

UHD Graphics P630 outperforms UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking853577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.42
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeCoffee Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)24 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24192
Core clock speed450 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data28.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPsno data3
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−157%
18−20
+157%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Elden Ring 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 10
−160%
24−27
+160%
Metro Exodus 7
−129%
16−18
+129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 4
−250%
14−16
+250%
Dota 2 5
−340%
21−24
+340%
Elden Ring 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
Far Cry 5 12
−142%
27−30
+142%
Fortnite 12−14
−217%
35−40
+217%
Forza Horizon 4 10
−160%
24−27
+160%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
−340%
21−24
+340%
Metro Exodus 5
−220%
16−18
+220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−141%
50−55
+141%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
World of Tanks 40−45
−135%
100−110
+135%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−136%
24−27
+136%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−141%
50−55
+141%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−131%
35−40
+131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
World of Tanks 14−16
−207%
45−50
+207%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Valorant 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Elden Ring 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Fortnite 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Valorant 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics P630 is 157% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics P630 is ahead in 43 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 6.41
Recency 3 January 2023 24 May 2018
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics P630, on the other hand, has a 176.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The UHD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 81 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.