Riva 128 vs UHD Graphics P630

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking573not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.71no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)no data
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT2NV3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 May 2018 (6 years ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed350 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data4 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate28.800.1
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPSno data
ROPs31
TMUs241

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)5.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2018 1 April 1997
Chip lithography 14 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has an age advantage of 21 year, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics P630 and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while Riva 128 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 39 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.