Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs UHD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCoffee-Lake-GT2Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (6 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores243584
Core clock speed300 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80291.4
Floating-point performance0.4608 gflops9.326 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.11.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 1 June 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 700% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics P630 and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 48 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.