Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs UHD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 4130 Radeon Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile Radeon Pro WX 7130 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with Radeon Pro WX 3200, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics P630
2018
15 Watt
6.39
+2.1%

UHD Graphics P630 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking573576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.54
Power efficiency29.716.72
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT2Polaris 23
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 May 2018 (6 years ago)2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192640
Core clock speed350 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8034.62
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs316
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.39
+2.1%
Pro WX 3200 6.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
+2.1%
Pro WX 3200 2414

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
+0%
18
+0%
4K8−9
+0%
8
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data11.06
4Kno data24.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−375%
35−40
+375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−82.1%
50−55
+82.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−375%
35−40
+375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−82.1%
50−55
+82.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−375%
35−40
+375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−11.1%
10
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−82.1%
50−55
+82.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Hitman 3 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 24
+0%
24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 14
+0%
14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 3200 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 3200 is ahead in 29 tests (42%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (58%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.39 6.26
Recency 24 May 2018 2 July 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics P630 and Radeon Pro WX 3200.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
vs
K3100M Quadro K3100M
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
Data Center GPU Max NEXT Data Center GPU Max NEXT
RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
RTX 2070 Super GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
RX 5300 Radeon RX 5300
RTX 2070 Super GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
R2 Graphics Radeon R2 Graphics
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 2
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 81 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.