GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon Pro 5300M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking345not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.44no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 14GP107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280768
Core clock speed1000 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate100.069.22
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPS2.215 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs8048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s84.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2019 1 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 75 Watt

Pro 5300M has an age advantage of 9 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, on the other hand, has 13.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5300M and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 170 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 51 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.