Quadro P520 vs UHD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630 Mobile UHD Graphics P750
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P500 Quadro P520 Quadro P520 Max-Q Quadro P600 Quadro P620

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with Quadro P520, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics P630
2020
15 Watt
6.39
+17.5%

UHD Graphics P630 outperforms P520 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
Quadro P520 Quadro P520

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking572607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.4520.89
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2GP108
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)23 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed350 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8035.83
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS1.147 TFLOPS
ROPs316
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48.06 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.11.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.39
+17.5%
Quadro P520 5.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
+17.5%
Quadro P520 2097

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+10.5%
19
−10.5%
4K21−24
+5%
20
−5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−71.4%
45−50
+71.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−71.4%
45−50
+71.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−22.2%
11
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−71.4%
45−50
+71.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Hitman 3 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and Quadro P520 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics P630 is 11% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics P630 is 5% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P520 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P520 is ahead in 29 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 37 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.39 5.44
Recency 13 May 2020 23 May 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 18 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has a 17.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 20% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P520 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Quadro P520
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
Quadro P520 Quadro P520
vs
FirePro M5100 FirePro M5100
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
RX 8800 XT Radeon RX 8800 XT
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
ATI VE AGP Radeon VE AGP
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
vs
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
Iris Plus Graphics 645 Iris Plus Graphics 645
vs
Graphics 512SP Radeon Graphics 512SP
Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
vs
Pro W6900X Radeon Pro W6900X
GTX 1660 Super GeForce GTX 1660 Super
vs
FX 5100 GeForce FX 5100
GTX 1660 Super GeForce GTX 1660 Super
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 9000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
vs
Pro W6900X Radeon Pro W6900X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 101 vote

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.