Quadro K2100M vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	575	725
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.63
Power efficiency	29.25	4.40
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	GK106
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$84.95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	576
Core clock speed	350 MHz	667 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	32.02
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	0.7684 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	16
TMUs	24	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	Ring Bus	MXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	48.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	+
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.40
+81.3%

K2100M 3.53

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
+81.3%

K2100M 1360

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

40−45
+73.9%

−73.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.69

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−200%

6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −178%	25 +178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	2−3
Hitman 3	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−250%

7−8
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and K2100M compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics P630 is 74% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K2100M is 350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

K2100M is ahead in 29 tests (48%)
there's a draw in 32 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.40	3.53
Recency	24 May 2018	23 July 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	55 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has a 81.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.