Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	577	530
Place by popularity	not in top-100	73
Power efficiency	29.42	18.61
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	80
Core clock speed	350 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	3	no data
TMUs	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16−18 −18.8%	19 +18.8%
1440p	8−9 −25%	10 +25%
4K	12−14 −25%	15 +25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +27.3%	11 −27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −7.7%	14 +7.7%
Elden Ring	16−18 −5.9%	18 +5.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +55.6%	9 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +8.3%	12 −8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −15.4%	30 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −68.8%	27 +68.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Valorant	18−20 +5.6%	18 −5.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +40%	10 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +160%	5 −160%
Dota 2	21−24 +0%	22 +0%
Elden Ring	16−18 +0%	17 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +11.5%	26 −11.5%
Fortnite	35−40 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +8.3%	24 −8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +69.2%	13 −69.2%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −15.1%	60−65 +15.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +217%	6 −217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Valorant	18−20 +35.7%	14 −35.7%
World of Tanks	100−110 −13.9%	110−120 +13.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +180%	5 −180%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +225%	4 −225%
Dota 2	21−24 −63.6%	36 +63.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −13.8%	30−35 +13.8%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +30%	20 −30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −15.1%	60−65 +15.1%
Valorant	18−20 −31.6%	24−27 +31.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 +0%	6 +0%
Elden Ring	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 +16.7%	6 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
World of Tanks	45−50 −19.6%	55−60 +19.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −45.5%	16 +45.5%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −25%	10 +25%
Valorant	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	1−2
Dota 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Elden Ring	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	1−2
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +12.5%	16 −12.5%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Fortnite	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Valorant	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 19% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 25% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 225% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 69% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics P630 is ahead in 16 tests (26%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 40 tests (66%)
there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.41	7.57
Recency	24 May 2018	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	28 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 86.7% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has a 18.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.