GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs UHD Graphics P630
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics P630 by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 572 | 294 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 17 |
Power efficiency | 29.49 | 28.69 |
Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
GPU code name | Comet Lake GT2 | GA107 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 17 December 2021 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1185 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1477 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+++ | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 94.53 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 6.05 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 3 | 32 |
TMUs | 24 | 64 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 256 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
HDMI | - | + |
G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
VR Ready | no data | + |
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
CUDA | - | 8.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 14−16
−207%
| 43
+207%
|
1440p | 12−14
−200%
| 36
+200%
|
4K | 10−12
−220%
| 32
+220%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2350%
|
49
+2350%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−1300%
|
40−45
+1300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−1800%
|
35−40
+1800%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2000%
|
42
+2000%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−1000%
|
44
+1000%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−1038%
|
90−95
+1038%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−1425%
|
60−65
+1425%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−214%
|
85−90
+214%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−1300%
|
40−45
+1300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−1800%
|
35−40
+1800%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30
+1400%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−975%
|
43
+975%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−1038%
|
90−95
+1038%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−1450%
|
62
+1450%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−367%
|
40−45
+367%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−214%
|
85−90
+214%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−1300%
|
40−45
+1300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−1800%
|
35−40
+1800%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1150%
|
25
+1150%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−875%
|
39
+875%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−1038%
|
90−95
+1038%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−1275%
|
55
+1275%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−267%
|
33
+267%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
+55.6%
|
18
−55.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 10−12 |
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−267%
|
21−24
+267%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−1800%
|
35−40
+1800%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1450%
|
30−35
+1450%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 42
+0%
|
42
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7
+0%
|
7
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 47
+0%
|
47
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics P630 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 2050 Mobile is 207% faster in 1080p
- RTX 2050 Mobile is 200% faster in 1440p
- RTX 2050 Mobile is 220% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 56% faster.
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 2350% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics P630 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
- RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (40%)
- there's a draw in 41 test (59%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 6.39 | 18.65 |
Recency | 13 May 2020 | 17 December 2021 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
UHD Graphics P630 has 200% lower power consumption.
RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 191.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.