RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) with RTX 5880 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
2021
4 Watt
2.00

RTX 5880 Ada Generation outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 4380% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8874
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.9021.85
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGen. 11AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)5 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3214080
Core clock speed350 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2460 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,082
Floating-point processing powerno data69.27 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data48 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−4275%
350−400
+4275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−4312%
750−800
+4312%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−3900%
400−450
+3900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−4329%
1550−1600
+4329%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−4312%
750−800
+4312%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−4067%
500−550
+4067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−4329%
1550−1600
+4329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6
−4233%
260−270
+4233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−4131%
550−600
+4131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−4329%
1550−1600
+4329%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−4233%
260−270
+4233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−3991%
450−500
+3991%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and RTX 5880 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 4275% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.00 89.60
Recency 11 January 2021 5 January 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 285 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has 7025% lower power consumption.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 4380% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 17 votes

Rate RTX 5880 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.