Tesla M2090 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) with Tesla M2090, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020
7 Watt
2.52

Tesla M2090 outperforms UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) by a whopping 277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking824461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.932.63
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64512
Core clock speed200 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data41.66
Floating-point processing powerno data1.332 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data924 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data177.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−246%
45−50
+246%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Hitman 3 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

This is how UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and Tesla M2090 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M2090 is 246% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.52 9.50
Recency 28 May 2020 25 July 2011
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 250 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 3471.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2090, on the other hand, has a 277% higher aggregate performance score.

The Tesla M2090 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a notebook card while Tesla M2090 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 29 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.