UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) vs Tesla M2070-Q

Place in the ranking	735	834
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	no data
Power efficiency	1.04	24.88
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GF100	Lakefield GT2
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)	28 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,489	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	64
Core clock speed	574 MHz	200 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	500 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	7 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.14	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.028 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	56	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	no data
Memory bus width	384 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	783 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	2.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

16−18
+23.1%

−23.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

343.06

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Elden Ring	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	5 +0%	5 +0%
Elden Ring	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	9 +0%	9 +0%
Fortnite	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
World of Tanks	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	15 +0%	15 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
World of Tanks	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Valorant	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Fortnite	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Valorant	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how Tesla M2070-Q and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compete in popular games:

Tesla M2070-Q is 23% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.39	2.53
Recency	25 July 2011	28 May 2020
Chip lithography	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	7 Watt

Tesla M2070-Q has a 34% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 3114.3% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M2070-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2070-Q is a workstation card while UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.