RTX A4500 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
6.15

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 640% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking57675
Place by popularity24not in top-100
ArchitectureAlder Lake (2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAlder Lake xGGA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores325888
Core clock speedno data930 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt140 Watt (80 - 140 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate26.40223.6
Floating-point performance0.8448 gflops14.31 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speed1550 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.15
RTX A4500 Mobile 45.48
+640%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016
RTX A4500 Mobile 17548
+1627%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−637%
140−150
+637%
4K14
−614%
100−110
+614%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
+500%
2−3
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−631%
95−100
+631%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−625%
290−300
+625%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−625%
290−300
+625%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−625%
290−300
+625%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−618%
280−290
+618%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Hitman 3 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 637% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 614% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.15 45.48
Recency 4 January 2022 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 140 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 833.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 639.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1156 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 16 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.