Arc Pro A30M vs UHD Graphics 770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 with Arc Pro A30M, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
6.16

Arc Pro A30M outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking580350
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Power efficiency28.1520.85
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40128.0
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.16
Arc Pro A30M 15.21
+147%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016
Arc Pro A30M 5862
+477%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−122%
40−45
+122%
4K14
−114%
30−35
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
−125%
27−30
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−140%
24−27
+140%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%
Hitman 3 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−143%
90−95
+143%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%
Hitman 3 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−143%
90−95
+143%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−122%
40−45
+122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%
Hitman 3 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
−125%
27−30
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−119%
35−40
+119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−133%
21−24
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Hitman 3 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Hitman 3 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and Arc Pro A30M compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro A30M is 122% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Pro A30M is 114% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.16 15.21
Recency 27 September 2022 8 August 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has an age advantage of 1 month, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has a 146.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro A30M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1268 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.