Arc Pro A60M vs UHD Graphics 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking576not rated
Place by popularity23not in top-100
ArchitectureAlder Lake (2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAlder Lake xGDG2-256
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)6 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Boost clock speed300 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40166.4
Floating-point performance0.8448 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed1550 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2022 6 June 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 533.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 770 and Arc Pro A60M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while Arc Pro A60M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
Intel Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1161 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.