Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Place in the ranking	369	795
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	67.05	no data
Architecture	no data	GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	Kaveri Spectre
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	14 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	384
Core clock speed	no data	720 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

no data

12 (FL 12_0)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 13.94
+409%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 2.74

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1768

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 7338
+315%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 11485
+478%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1988

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1613
+14.8%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1406

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 83293
+763%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 9651

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 9013
+50535%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 18

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−7.7%

14
+7.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27
+380%

5−6

−380%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +1175%	4−5 −1175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +357%	7−8 −357%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +640%	5−6 −640%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +514%	7−8 −514%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +621%	14−16 −621%
Hitman 3	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +276%	21−24 −276%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +2550%	2−3 −2550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +617%	6−7 −617%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +325%	12−14 −325%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +111%	35−40 −111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +1175%	4−5 −1175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +357%	7−8 −357%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +640%	5−6 −640%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +514%	7−8 −514%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +621%	14−16 −621%
Hitman 3	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +276%	21−24 −276%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +2550%	2−3 −2550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +617%	6−7 −617%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +164%	14−16 −164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +111%	35−40 −111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +357%	7−8 −357%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +640%	5−6 −640%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +621%	14−16 −621%
Hitman 3	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +276%	21−24 −276%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +325%	12−14 −325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +164%	14−16 −164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +111%	35−40 −111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+617%

6−7

−617%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +419%	16−18 −419%
Hitman 3	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +357%	7−8 −357%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +460%	5−6 −460%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +480%	5−6 −480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +500%	16−18 −500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+333%

6−7

−333%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Hitman 3	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +464%	14−16 −464%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+250%

4−5

−250%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) compete in popular games:

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is 8% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 2550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 59 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.94	2.74
Recency	30 March 2021	14 January 2014
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 408.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.