Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 2.76% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

Summary

AMD started Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) sales 14 January 2014. This is a GCN architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking800
Place by popularitynot in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameKaveri Spectre
Market segmentDesktop
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed720 MHzof 2670 MHz (Arc B580)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Shared memory+

API compatibility

APIs supported by Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop), sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop). The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 2.76

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1988

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 7338

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1406

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 9651

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 89954

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 18

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Battlefield 5 4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
Metro Exodus 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Battlefield 5 4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
Metro Exodus 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
Far Cry 5 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5

Closest competitors

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s performance relative to its closest rivals among desktop graphics cards.


Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 100

NVIDIA equivalent

According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is GeForce GT 545, which is faster by 4% and higher by 11 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop):

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) according to our statistics.

All comparisons with Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.9 21 vote

Rate Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.