GeForce 8800 GT vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

UHD Graphics 710 Mobile UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
VS
8800 GS 8800 GS Mac Edition 8800 GT 8800 GT Mac Edition 8800 GTS 512 9600 GSO 9600 GTX 9800 GT 9800 GT Rebrand 9800 GTX 9800 GX2 GTS 150 OEM

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) with GeForce 8800 GT, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
15 Watt
14.09
+1064%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms 8800 GT by a whopping 1064% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
8800 GT 8800 GT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3801064
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Power efficiency64.400.66
Architectureno dataTesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1G92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)29 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data112
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data754 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt105 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data33.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.336 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno dataSingle Slot
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)no data128bit

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data349.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Far Cry 5 9 0−1
Fortnite 75−80
+1167%
6−7
−1167%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Valorant 110−120
+1156%
9−10
−1156%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+1207%
14−16
−1207%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Dota 2 27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Far Cry 5 8 0−1
Fortnite 75−80
+1167%
6−7
−1167%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Grand Theft Auto V 6 0−1
Metro Exodus 7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Valorant 110−120
+1156%
9−10
−1156%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Dota 2 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Far Cry 5 8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Valorant 110−120
+1156%
9−10
−1156%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+1167%
6−7
−1167%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+1138%
8−9
−1138%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+1156%
9−10
−1156%
Valorant 130−140
+1290%
10−11
−1290%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Valorant 70−75
+1083%
6−7
−1083%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and 8800 GT compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 1200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.09 1.21
Recency 30 March 2021 29 October 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 105 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 1064.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while GeForce 8800 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8800 GT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8800 GT GeForce 8800 GT
vs
HD 7560D Radeon HD 7560D
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded
vs
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU M3 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
R9 390X2 R9 390X2
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
vs
Arc A770M Arc A770M
ATI 7500 Radeon 7500
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Playstation 4 Slim GPU Playstation 4 Slim GPU
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
vs
Arc A310 Arc A310
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
Arc A750 Arc A750
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 690 Adreno 690
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 690 Adreno 690
Arc A780 Arc A780
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 115 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 619 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) or GeForce 8800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.