Radeon RX 6550M vs Arc A770M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770M and Radeon RX 6550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A770M
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
30.63
+22.9%

Arc A770M outperforms RX 6550M by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking181216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.4921.35
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961024
Core clock speed1650 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2840 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate524.8181.8
Floating-point processing power16.79 TFLOPS5.816 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs25664
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770M 30.63
+22.9%
RX 6550M 24.93

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770M 11799
+22.8%
RX 6550M 9605

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A770M 37375
+82.3%
RX 6550M 20506

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A770M 25563
+73.9%
RX 6550M 14696

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc A770M 10783
+137%
RX 6550M 4546

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD97
+31.1%
74
−31.1%
1440p57
+148%
23
−148%
4K39
+30%
30−35
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 113
+183%
40−45
−183%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+57.4%
50−55
−57.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+64.3%
40−45
−64.3%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+60%
80−85
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+62%
50−55
−62%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+138%
40−45
−138%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+53.6%
55−60
−53.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+54.7%
60−65
−54.7%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+34%
140−150
−34%
Hitman 3 85−90
+73.5%
45−50
−73.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+46.9%
110−120
−46.9%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+51.2%
80−85
−51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+45.3%
60−65
−45.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+77.1%
80−85
−77.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+27.5%
100−110
−27.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+57.4%
50−55
−57.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+64.3%
40−45
−64.3%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+60%
80−85
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+62%
50−55
−62%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+53.6%
55−60
−53.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+54.7%
60−65
−54.7%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+34%
140−150
−34%
Hitman 3 85−90
+73.5%
45−50
−73.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+46.9%
110−120
−46.9%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+51.2%
80−85
−51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+45.3%
60−65
−45.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 211
+109%
101
−109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+56.6%
50−55
−56.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+27.5%
100−110
−27.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+57.4%
50−55
−57.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+64.3%
40−45
−64.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+62%
50−55
−62%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+67.5%
40−45
−67.5%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+53.6%
55−60
−53.6%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+34%
140−150
−34%
Hitman 3 85−90
+73.5%
45−50
−73.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
−7.6%
110−120
+7.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 179
+103%
88
−103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+4.1%
49
−4.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+27.5%
100−110
−27.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+45.3%
60−65
−45.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+63.8%
45−50
−63.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+64.9%
35−40
−64.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+72%
24−27
−72%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+67.9%
27−30
−67.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+193%
14−16
−193%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+64.3%
27−30
−64.3%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+59.3%
140−150
−59.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
+79.3%
27−30
−79.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 82
+64%
50−55
−64%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+63%
45−50
−63%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+83%
50−55
−83%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+93.3%
30−33
−93.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+39.6%
130−140
−39.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+68.3%
40−45
−68.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%
Hitman 3 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+46%
120−130
−46%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+82.1%
27−30
−82.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+138%
24−27
−138%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+267%
6−7
−267%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+64.7%
30−35
−64.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 74
+147%
30−33
−147%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%

This is how Arc A770M and RX 6550M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 31% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 148% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 30% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770M is 267% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6550M is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • RX 6550M is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.63 24.93
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 80 Watt

Arc A770M has a 22.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6550M, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6550M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M
AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 90 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 197 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.