RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
2022
7.18

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) by a whopping 532% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data84.16
Power efficiencyno data44.60
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeAD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores642816
Core clock speedno data1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data187.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data88
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−519%
130−140
+519%
1440p11
−491%
65−70
+491%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.99
1440pno data9.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−511%
110−120
+511%
Elden Ring 16
−525%
100−105
+525%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−471%
40−45
+471%
Forza Horizon 4 32
−525%
200−210
+525%
Metro Exodus 19
−532%
120−130
+532%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
Valorant 25
−500%
150−160
+500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Counter-Strike 2 8
−525%
50−55
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−483%
35−40
+483%
Dota 2 26
−515%
160−170
+515%
Elden Ring 16
−525%
100−105
+525%
Far Cry 5 27
−530%
170−180
+530%
Fortnite 40−45
−519%
260−270
+519%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−515%
160−170
+515%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
−525%
75−80
+525%
Metro Exodus 13
−515%
80−85
+515%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−503%
350−400
+503%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Valorant 18
−511%
110−120
+511%
World of Tanks 110−120
−531%
700−750
+531%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Dota 2 49
−512%
300−310
+512%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−525%
200−210
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 20
−500%
120−130
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−503%
350−400
+503%
Valorant 22
−491%
130−140
+491%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6
−483%
35−40
+483%
Elden Ring 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−483%
35−40
+483%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−515%
240−250
+515%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
World of Tanks 50−55
−477%
300−310
+477%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Valorant 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Elden Ring 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−519%
130−140
+519%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Dota 2 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Fortnite 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Valorant 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

This is how UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 519% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 491% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.18 45.35
Recency 4 January 2022 12 February 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 531.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 377 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 29 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.