Quadro P4200 vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 630 with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 630
2017
15 Watt
3.09

P4200 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a whopping 713% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking755209
Place by popularity47not in top-100
Power efficiency14.8618.13
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1842304
Core clock speed350 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1647 MHz
Number of transistors189 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45237.2
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs23144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1MXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 3.09
Quadro P4200 25.13
+713%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192
Quadro P4200 10439
+776%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−700%
120−130
+700%
1440p10
−700%
80−85
+700%
4K7
−686%
55−60
+686%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5
−720%
40−45
+720%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−686%
55−60
+686%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Battlefield 5 10
−720%
80−85
+720%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
Far Cry 5 7
−729%
55−60
+729%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
−633%
65−70
+633%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−387%
140−150
+387%
Hitman 3 6
−750%
50−55
+750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−404%
110−120
+404%
Metro Exodus 13
−562%
85−90
+562%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−622%
65−70
+622%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−431%
85−90
+431%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
−243%
100−110
+243%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−867%
55−60
+867%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−725%
65−70
+725%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−441%
140−150
+441%
Hitman 3 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−404%
110−120
+404%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2050%
85−90
+2050%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−608%
85−90
+608%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−260%
50−55
+260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
−268%
100−110
+268%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−867%
55−60
+867%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−759%
140−150
+759%
Hitman 3 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−404%
110−120
+404%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−673%
85−90
+673%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−286%
50−55
+286%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−164%
100−110
+164%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−860%
45−50
+860%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Hitman 3 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−550%
50−55
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−647%
140−150
+647%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 700% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 700% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4200 is 686% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 25.13
Recency 1 October 2017 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 4 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has a 713.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3788 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.