GeForce RTX 5080 vs UHD Graphics 630

Place in the ranking	771	3
Place by popularity	35	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	41.39
Power efficiency	14.18	18.33
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	Comet Lake GT2	GB203
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2017 (7 years ago)	30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	184	10752
Core clock speed	350 MHz	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	2617 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	360 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.45	879.3
Floating-point processing power	0.4232 TFLOPS	56.28 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	128
TMUs	23	336
Tensor Cores	no data	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.4
CUDA	-	10.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 2.97

RTX 5080 92.10
+3001%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192

RTX 5080 36911
+2997%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	15 −1187%	193 +1187%
1440p	10 −1440%	154 +1440%
4K	7 −1357%	102 +1357%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.18
1440p	no data	6.49
4K	no data	9.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −1809%	210−220 +1809%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −2900%	150−160 +2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8 −1363%	110−120 +1363%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −1809%	210−220 +1809%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Forza Horizon 4	13 −2977%	400−450 +2977%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −9533%	280−290 +9533%
Metro Exodus	8 −2225%	180−190 +2225%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 −1633%	150−160 +1633%
Valorant	8 −8938%	700−750 +8938%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1363%	110−120 +1363%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −1809%	210−220 +1809%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Dota 2	11 −1491%	170−180 +1491%
Far Cry 5	13 −1108%	157 +1108%
Fortnite	16−18 −1712%	300−350 +1712%
Forza Horizon 4	12 −2817%	350−400 +2817%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −9533%	280−290 +9533%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −3000%	180−190 +3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	33 −552%	210−220 +552%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1318%	150−160 +1318%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −3380%	170−180 +3380%
Valorant	4−5 −17975%	700−750 +17975%
World of Tanks	29 −862%	270−280 +862%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1363%	110−120 +1363%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −1918%	222 +1918%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Dota 2	19 −2795%	550−600 +2795%
Far Cry 5	10 −1770%	180−190 +1770%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −2627%	300−310 +2627%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −9533%	280−290 +9533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −668%	210−220 +668%
Valorant	4−5 −17975%	700−750 +17975%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 −16800%	160−170 +16800%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −2995%	650−700 +2995%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −4550%	90−95 +4550%
World of Tanks	21−24 −2357%	500−550 +2357%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −2800%	85−90 +2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1900%	160−170 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −5500%	220−230 +5500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −2900%	180−190 +2900%
Valorant	10−11 −5390%	500−550 +5390%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1069%	180−190 +1069%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −2900%	450−500 +2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −2222%	200−210 +2222%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −3100%	60−65 +3100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −2713%	450−500 +2713%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −4450%	90−95 +4450%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Dota 2	7 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3400%	100−110 +3400%
Fortnite	2−3 −4700%	95−100 +4700%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −14600%	140−150 +14600%
Valorant	3−4 −10867%	300−350 +10867%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus

150−160

+0%

150−160

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	109 +0%	109 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and RTX 5080 compete in popular games:

RTX 5080 is 1187% faster in 1080p
RTX 5080 is 1440% faster in 1440p
RTX 5080 is 1357% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5080 is 17975% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 5080 is ahead in 40 tests (91%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.97	92.10
Recency	1 October 2017	30 January 2025
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	360 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 2300% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080, on the other hand, has a 3001% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5080 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.