ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs UHD Graphics 620

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking807not rated
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Power efficiency12.41no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2RV530
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz590 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt42 Watt
Texture fill rate24.002.360
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs34
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared690 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.08 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 620 1030
+796%
ATI X1600 XT 115

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2017 1 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 42 Watt

UHD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 180% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon X1600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 620 is a notebook card while Radeon X1600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
ATI Radeon X1600 XT
Radeon X1600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4373 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 41 vote

Rate Radeon X1600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.