GeForce GTX 770M vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	559	543
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	4.53
Power efficiency	9.51	6.65
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Baffin	GK106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$189.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	960
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	811 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	797 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	63.76
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	1.53 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	24
TMUs	56	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Standard memory configuration	no data	GDDR5
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	96.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support	no data	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
HDMI	-	+
HDCP content protection	-	+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	-	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
Blu-Ray 3D Support	-	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	-	+
Optimus	-	+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 API
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.91

GTX 770M 7.24
+4.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4150 2658

GTX 770M 2784
+4.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

45−50

−8.9%

49
+8.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Elden Ring	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Valorant	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
Elden Ring	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −3.2%	30−35 +3.2%
Fortnite	40−45 −4.9%	40−45 +4.9%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −5.4%	55−60 +5.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −9.5%	23 +9.5%
Valorant	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
World of Tanks	100−110 −41.1%	151 +41.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −3.2%	30−35 +3.2%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −5.4%	55−60 +5.4%
Valorant	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Elden Ring	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
World of Tanks	50−55 −4%	50−55 +4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Valorant	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Elden Ring	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −5%	21−24 +5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Fortnite	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Valorant	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and GTX 770M compete in popular games:

GTX 770M is 9% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 770M is ahead in 38 tests (60%)
there's a draw in 25 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.91	7.24
Recency	1 March 2017	30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

GTX 770M, on the other hand, has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and GeForce GTX 770M.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 770M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.