Quadro K5100M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs
VS
K3000M K3100M K4000M K4100M K5000M K5100M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with Quadro K5100M, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.04
+23.2%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms K5100M by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
K5100M K5100M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking444509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.85
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGK104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961536
Core clock speedno data771 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data98.69
Floating-point processing powerno data2.369 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data115.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.04
+23.2%
K5100M 8.15

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+4.3%
K5100M 4793

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+15.4%
52
−15.4%
4K30−35
+7.1%
28
−7.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+24.5%
50−55
−24.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+17.4%
45−50
−17.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+24.5%
50−55
−24.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+17.4%
45−50
−17.4%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−215%
82
+215%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+24.5%
50−55
−24.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+85.7%
14
−85.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+41.9%
30−35
−41.9%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+44.8%
27−30
−44.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−42.9%
10
+42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and K5100M compete in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 15% faster in 1080p
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 86% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the K5100M is 215% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 31 test (43%)
  • K5100M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.04 8.15
Recency 15 August 2020 23 July 2013
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 23.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K5100M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Quadro K5100M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
K5100M Quadro K5100M
vs
Pro 555 Radeon Pro 555
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
7100 GS GeForce 7100 GS
vs
FX 1000 Quadro FX 1000
RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh
vs
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
K4000M Quadro K4000M
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
Go 7900 GS GeForce Go 7900 GS
vs
RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
A100 PCIe 80 GB A100 PCIe 80 GB
vs
RTX A5000-8Q RTX A5000 8Q
HD 6990M Rebrand Radeon HD 6990M Rebrand
vs
ATI HD 3610 Radeon HD 3610
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
GT 625M GeForce GT 625M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 50 votes

Rate Quadro K5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.