Arc A370M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Place in the ranking	454	385
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	26.18
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1024
Core clock speed	no data	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1550 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	99.20
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

no data

PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.95

Arc A370M 13.31
+33.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000

Arc A370M 8149
+63%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27−30 −40.7%	38 +40.7%
1440p	14−16 −50%	21 +50%
4K	27−30 −48.1%	40 +48.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −34.4%	40−45 +34.4%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −22%	50−55 +22%
Fortnite	55−60 −29.3%	75−80 +29.3%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −85%	74 +85%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −29.9%	100−105 +29.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%
Valorant	35−40 −40.5%	50−55 +40.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −34.4%	40−45 +34.4%
Dota 2	35−40 −16.7%	42 +16.7%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +70.8%	24 −70.8%
Fortnite	55−60 −29.3%	75−80 +29.3%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −55%	62 +55%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +20.7%	29 −20.7%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +108%	13 −108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −27.3%	95−100 +27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −33.3%	40−45 +33.3%
Valorant	35−40 −40.5%	50−55 +40.5%
World of Tanks	140−150 −23.6%	170−180 +23.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −34.4%	40−45 +34.4%
Dota 2	35−40 −83.3%	66 +83.3%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −24.4%	50−55 +24.4%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −32.5%	53 +32.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −27.3%	95−100 +27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −33.3%	40−45 +33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60

−29.3%

75−80
+29.3%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +18.2%	11 −18.2%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Valorant	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −40.9%	30−35 +40.9%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −68.2%	37 +68.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

24−27

−20%

30−33
+20%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Valorant	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Dota 2	20−22 −100%	40 +100%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

10−11

−20%

12−14
+20%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +0%	46 +0%
Elden Ring	35 +0%	35 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 +0%	19 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 +0%	13 +0%
Elden Ring	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +0%	11 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	11 +0%	11 +0%
Elden Ring	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
World of Tanks	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Valorant	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Elden Ring	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Fortnite	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

Arc A370M is 41% faster in 1080p
Arc A370M is 50% faster in 1440p
Arc A370M is 48% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 108% faster.
in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A370M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games: