Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Tesla T4G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameTU104Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 September 2018 (6 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256019456
Core clock speed585 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate254.42,554
Floating-point processing power8.141 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs64no data
TMUs1601216
Tensor Cores3201216
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB192 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s5,171 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2018 6 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 192 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 750 Watt

Tesla T4G has 971.4% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla T4G and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla T4G
Tesla T4G
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Tesla T4G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 59 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.