Tesla T4G vs Radeon Instinct MI300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAqua VanjaramTU104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)13 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140802560
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors153,000 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate1,496254.4
ROPsno data64
TMUs880160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 GB16 GB
Memory bus width8192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3.2 GB/s10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth3,277 GB/s320.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 13 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 70 Watt

Instinct MI300 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla T4G, on the other hand, has 757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct MI300 and Tesla T4G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI300 is a desktop card while Tesla T4G is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300
NVIDIA Tesla T4G
Tesla T4G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla T4G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.