Radeon 890M vs Tesla T4G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data100.00
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameTU104Strix Point
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 September 2018 (6 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed585 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate254.4185.6
Floating-point processing power8.141 TFLOPS5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla T4G and Radeon 890M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla T4G is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 890M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla T4G
Tesla T4G
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Tesla T4G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 85 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.