Tesla T4G vs Radeon 780M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking302not rated
Place by popularity49not in top-100
Power efficiency83.73no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePhoenixTU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)13 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed800 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speed2700 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate129.6254.4
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS8.141 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Cores1240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 13 September 2018
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and Tesla T4G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a notebook card while Tesla T4G is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA Tesla T4G
Tesla T4G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1546 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Tesla T4G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.