Tesla C2075 vs Tesla M60

Place in the ranking	281	486
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.52	2.44
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GM204	GF110
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 August 2015 (9 years ago)	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	448
Core clock speed	557 MHz	574 MHz
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,200 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	247 Watt
Texture fill rate	150.8	32.14
Floating-point processing power	4.825 TFLOPS	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	128	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	783 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	150.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.2	2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M60 19.57
+124%

Tesla C2075 8.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla M60 7551
+124%

Tesla C2075 3364

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.57	8.72
Recency	30 August 2015	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	247 Watt

Tesla M60 has a 124.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla C2075, on the other hand, has 21.5% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla C2075 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.