Radeon 530X vs Quadro P6000
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 109 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.89 | no data |
Power efficiency | 11.04 | no data |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
GPU code name | GP102 | Meso |
Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2016 (8 years ago) | 18 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 1021 MHz |
Number of transistors | 11,800 million | 1,040 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 50 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 394.8 | 24.50 |
Floating-point processing power | 12.63 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 96 | 8 |
TMUs | 240 | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | None |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | 384 Bit | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1127 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | Up to 432 GB/s | 32 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | no data |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | no data |
HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | + | no data |
3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
Mosaic | + | no data |
High-Performance Video I/O6 | + | no data |
nView Desktop Management | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 October 2016 | 18 April 2017 |
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 2 GB |
Chip lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 50 Watt |
Quadro P6000 has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
Radeon 530X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro P6000 and Radeon 530X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 530X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.