ATI Radeon 9800 PRO vs Tesla M2090

Place in the ranking	465	1418
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.62	0.22
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code name	GF110	R350
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)	1 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	no data
Core clock speed	651 MHz	380 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	117 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	47 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.66	3.040
Floating-point processing power	1.332 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	8
TMUs	64	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	AGP 8x
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	924 MHz	340 MHz
Memory bandwidth	177.4 GB/s	21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.51	0.15
Recency	25 July 2011	1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	47 Watt

Tesla M2090 has a 6240% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO, on the other hand, has 431.9% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M2090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9800 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.