Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs Tesla C2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking489not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.45no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGF110Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44814336
Core clock speed574 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate32.141,389
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS44.44 TFLOPS
ROPs48no data
TMUs56896
Tensor Coresno data896
Ray Tracing Coresno data112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount6 GB96 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s2,458 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 247 Watt 450 Watt

Tesla C2075 has 82.2% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max 1350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and Data Center GPU Max 1350. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Tesla C2075
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
Data Center GPU Max 1350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.