ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs Tesla K40st

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.02
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGK110BRV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 November 2013 (11 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880no data
Core clock speed575 MHz239 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate138.00.96
Floating-point processing power3.312 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs2404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s5.248 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 28 Watt

Tesla K40st has an age advantage of 10 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 775% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K40st and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K40st is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40st
Tesla K40st
ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Tesla K40st on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.