Jetson AGX Xavier vs GRID K280Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking533not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.40no data
Power efficiency2.26no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK104GV10B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 June 2013 (11 years ago)October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,875 $899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536512
Core clock speed745 MHz854 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1377 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million9,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate95.3644.06
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS1.41 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12832
Tensor Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA3.07.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 30 Watt

Jetson AGX Xavier has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K280Q and Jetson AGX Xavier. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K280Q is a workstation card while Jetson AGX Xavier is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K280Q
GRID K280Q
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier
Jetson AGX Xavier

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K280Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 16 votes

Rate Jetson AGX Xavier on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.