P102-100 vs Tesla K40m

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking510not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
Power efficiency2.30no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK110BGP102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 November 2013 (10 years ago)12 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28803200
Core clock speed745 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz1683 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate210.2336.6
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPS10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs4880
TMUs240200

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount12 GB5 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s440.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.56.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 12 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 250 Watt

Tesla K40m has a 140% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 2% lower power consumption.

P102-100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K40m and P102-100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Tesla K40m
NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 20 votes

Rate Tesla K40m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 29 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.